Comments on: Best Records vs. Top-4 Seeds, 1984-2010
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442
NBA & ABA Basketball Statistics & HistoryMon, 21 Nov 2011 20:56:04 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6By: Jason J
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37382
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:47:15 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37382You know you're team is ridiculous when Michael Jordan drops 63 on you in the playoffs and you still win the game.
]]>By: Jay
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37357
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:10:50 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37357That '86 Celtics team continues to show others why there are the best ever. The Celtics that year were 31-5 vs 50+ win teams (including postseason). Pretty damn impressive. They were also ranked #1 in defense & rebounding, they had a lethal front court with Parish/McHale/Bird/Walton & the backcourt was led by HOFer Dennis Johnson. And you know this team is scary when your fifth offensive option is averaging 15 PPG+ on 55% shooting in the postseason (Danny Ainge).
]]>By: Jason J
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37318
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:10:08 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37318That 2010 Celts team tanked the second half of the season though trying to rest Pierce and KG (in hindsight). Not surprised to see them so low on the list.
Not surprised to see the 86 Celts, 96 Bulls, and 2000 Lakers on top either. Those were hugely talented teams with fantastic chemistry on both sides and very few weaknesses to exploit.
]]>By: Neil Paine
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37284
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:24:51 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37284You mean APBRmetrics? Yes, it looks like they're having a problem. Not sure if Kevin Pelton still runs the show there, but he used to be the guy to get in touch with when it went down.
("Apebears"? Classic. :)
]]>By: Greyberger
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37282
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:44:06 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37282Is sonicscentral.com/apebears down?
]]>By: Knick with the Knack
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37247
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:33:00 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37247More evidence for my longstanding belief that the '93 Knicks were the best team in the league. @#$%^%$#& Charles Smith bull#&@! non-call....
]]>By: Sean
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37233
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:09:12 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37233Wow. That 1986 Celtics crew continues to impress.
]]>By: Neil Paine
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37212
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:25:14 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37212Re: #3 - Actually, this doesn't include playoff games vs. the top-4 seeds; it's regular-season only.
]]>By: Chuck
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37209
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:12:30 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37209Look at that cluster of teams in the early '90s that went .500. Four in 1991, including the first Bulls championship team, and three in 1992. And interesting to note that the Suns had the same record vs. Top 4 teams in 1992, pre-Barkley trade, as they did in 1993, after they got Sir Charles.
]]>By: Ben
http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442&cpage=1#comment-37208
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:06:56 +0000http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=8442#comment-37208Good stuff, but I think you buried the lead. The correlation data is pretty interesting.
]]>