Comments on: BBR Rankings: Schedule-Adjusted Offensive and Defensive Ratings (April 8, 2011) http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200 NBA & ABA Basketball Statistics & History Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:56:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6 By: Matt http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47967 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:03:36 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47967 I'll be very interested to see the post-deadline rankings. Are you doing the Stat Geek Smackdown again?

]]> By: Ben http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47964 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:07:09 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47964 Still like these rankings a lot. Would love to see updates during the playoffs if you're still game.

]]> By: Neil Paine http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47901 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:11:11 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47901 Sure, I think I'm going to add a whole table of "post-deadline rankings" to my final regular-season rankings post on Thursday.

]]> By: Matt http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47897 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:49:02 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47897 Neil, is there any way you can do this for the Nuggets just accounting for their post-Carmelo games? I'm curious how they would rank and how their defense stacks up.

]]> By: Anon http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47786 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 02:25:56 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47786 "While not perfect they are much better then arbitrarily assigning credit for wins, like some fools out there enjoy doing."

Preach.

]]> By: P Middy http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47772 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:14:52 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47772 #8 - Rose backers would be hard pressed to admit it. I know what the exact effect is. It starts to overcome me when I watch him too. He is so fast, explosive, athletic, and has the jordan-like ability to hang in mid air and change shot attempts and still hit them. He's, despite Blake Griffin's dunk repertoire and LeBron's LeBroness, easily the most amazing player this season. It's hard to watch him abuse Rondo and not think he's the greatest.

All that said, I still think he's third on my list after LeBron and Dwight in that order.

]]> By: P Middy http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47771 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:05:14 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47771 #6 - win share. eff. Sure. Whatever you want to use. The idea is mostly to add up stats and divide by salary. There's no deep bball ideology involved here.

]]> By: huevonkiller http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47767 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:35:21 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47767 #2 The 7.22 just shows how much they rely on defense to be an elite team. So it actually hurts the Rose lovers I would say.

]]> By: huevonkiller http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47766 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:33:16 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47766 We already have win based stats, look at win shares, EWA, WARP, whatever.

While not perfect they are much better then arbitrarily assigning credit for wins, like some fools out there enjoy doing.

]]> By: Dave http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200&cpage=1#comment-47764 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:15:45 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9200#comment-47764 @4 I am wondering why wins is not a factor in your calculation? Is that not something you believe players can produce?

]]>