Chicago/New York? Chicago/Cleveland, Pistons/Chicago, LA/SA, LA/Sac, LA/Portland, Utah/LA (90's), LA/Utah (2008-2010), etc. There are multiple instances within a conference.
Game 5 2002: Shaq got 1 FT and fouled out in 32 minutes. Lakers lost by 1 point, just looks like you dislike them.
If Shaq and Kobe play 44-40 minutes a game each, why shouldn't the Lakers win? They weren't as deep as Sac but they shortened their rotation. Take out some of Samaki Walker and Devean George's minutes for Shaq and Kobe.
]]>I forgot the Spurs in 2001 and 2002 as well, when they kept losing to the Lakers. 1st and 3rd in SRS.
]]>Those are A LOT of exceptions.
"Some exceptions...1982 LA over Philly after Lakers beat 76ers in 1980; 1987 LA over Boston after 85 same result. But in 87 Boston was decimated by injury and a brutal gauntlet to just reach the Finals."
And Boston in 81 and 86. You made it sound absolute until the end. Bulls, Lakers, Lakers, Celtics.
Also teams frequently lose Conference Finals to the same opponent, think of the Kings vs the Lakers. It wasn't the Finals but it was the real Finals.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/SAC/2001.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/SAC/2002.html
1960 & 61 boston over st louis
]]>1978 Wash over Sea
1979 Sea over Wash
1982 LA over Philly
1983 Philly over LA
1984 Boston over LA
1985 LA over Boston
1988 LA over Detroit
1989 Detroit over LA
2008 Boston over LA
2010 LA over Boston
Some exceptions...1982 LA over Philly after Lakers beat 76ers in 1980; 1987 LA over Boston after 85 same result. But in 87 Boston was decimated by injury and a brutal gauntlet to just reach the Finals.
]]>