Comments on: Sean Forman Sims the NCAA Tournament http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754 NBA & ABA Basketball Statistics & History Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:56:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6 By: Why Simulate http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754&cpage=1#comment-9544 Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:14:41 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754#comment-9544 Sean,

Why actually simulate the games? Can't you just figure out what would happen in an infinite number of simulations through simple multiplication and addition of the different probabilities of making a round/facing a team/beating that team? Is it because simulation lets you look at individual matchups more easily?

]]>
By: Sean Forman http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754&cpage=1#comment-9444 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:03:01 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754#comment-9444 Neil,

Arizona State is probably the better team to get into the Elite 8, but since they have a harder row to hoe, they are a worse bet to make it (IMO) to that round. I have to say that I think the way yours provides the score is pretty sweet.

]]>
By: Neil Paine http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754&cpage=1#comment-9442 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:33:47 +0000 http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=1754#comment-9442 What's remarkable is that the only places where our systems differed were Arizona State's Elite 8 chances (I had ASU beating the 'Cuse & OU), UCLA vs. Duke in the Sweet 16 (I had the Bruins pulling the upset), and the Memphis-UNC title game (I had Memphis winning it all). Not bad for two fairly different statistical methodologies...

]]>