I think the reason the Lakers are #1 in the MLE ranking is that the MLE is using purely W-L, where as the BBR is using margin of victory. The Lakers have been super clutch in close games (6-0 in games decided by 3 pts or less) while the Cavs have not (only 2-5). The BBR method will give only a slight advantage to the Lakers for this difference as the scoring margin is only a few points difference where as MLE gives a huge advantage for the Lakers as they win the close games.
Is there any studies out there on whether a teams ability to win a close game has any predictive value or is the result of a close game more of a coin flip type of situation.
]]>