Top-10 Overall Despite Being Below-Average in Three of the Four Factors
Posted by Neil Paine on March 3, 2011
While I'm en route to Boston for the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, here's a neat question SI's Zach Lowe had regarding the Memphis Grizzlies' defense:
"Memphis has emerged as a top-10 defensive team despite being good at only one of the four factors--forcing turnovers, which they do extremely well. They rank below the league average in eFG (barely below the avg), DRB rate (horrible) and FT/FGA (somewhere in between). I have a feeling it's unusual for a team to rank in the top-10 overall while ranking below the league average in 3 of the 4 defensive factors, but perhaps it's not as unusual as I think it might be."
It is very unusual, in fact. Since 1974, the first year we can compute the Factors, just eleven defenses (including Memphis) have ranked in the top 10 despite being below-average in 3 of 4 Factors. And if we expand it to include either offense or defense, the list contains only 27 teams:
Year | Team | Type | Rtg | Rk | efg% | <avg | tov% | <avg | rb% | <avg | ftr | <avg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1974 | Philadelphia 76ers | Defense | 99.0 | 10 | 46.8 | ✔ | 17.6 | 66.7 | ✔ | 21.0 | ✔ | |
1975 | Portland Trail Blazers | Defense | 97.7 | 6 | 45.0 | 16.0 | ✔ | 69.6 | ✔ | 22.8 | ✔ | |
1976 | Phoenix Suns | Defense | 97.9 | 7 | 46.8 | ✔ | 17.3 | 69.1 | ✔ | 22.9 | ✔ | |
1976 | Chicago Bulls | Defense | 98.0 | 9 | 46.7 | ✔ | 15.8 | ✔ | 74.6 | 23.2 | ✔ | |
1978 | Atlanta Hawks | Defense | 99.8 | 6 | 47.4 | ✔ | 19.9 | 67.0 | ✔ | 32.9 | ✔ | |
1984 | Milwaukee Bucks | Defense | 103.6 | 2 | 45.9 | 14.7 | ✔ | 65.6 | ✔ | 26.6 | ✔ | |
1986 | Denver Nuggets | Defense | 105.9 | 9 | 49.5 | ✔ | 16.9 | 64.1 | ✔ | 26.6 | ✔ | |
1989 | New York Knickerbockers | Defense | 107.5 | 10 | 50.4 | ✔ | 16.7 | 65.1 | ✔ | 24.9 | ✔ | |
2004 | Toronto Raptors | Defense | 100.4 | 7 | 44.9 | 14.1 | ✔ | 70.1 | ✔ | 24.1 | ✔ | |
2009 | Utah Jazz | Defense | 107.3 | 10 | 50.5 | ✔ | 15.0 | 72.7 | ✔ | 26.2 | ✔ | |
2011 | Memphis Grizzlies | Defense | 104.8 | 8 | 49.8 | ✔ | 15.7 | 71.9 | ✔ | 23.3 | ✔ | |
1976 | Cleveland Cavaliers | Offense | 99.5 | 3 | 45.4 | ✔ | 13.5 | 29.9 | ✔ | 17.5 | ✔ | |
1977 | Kansas City Kings | Offense | 100.5 | 8 | 46.0 | ✔ | 15.4 | 30.9 | ✔ | 22.1 | ✔ | |
1977 | Detroit Pistons | Offense | 100.3 | 9 | 48.3 | 16.6 | ✔ | 30.7 | ✔ | 18.5 | ✔ | |
1977 | New York Knickerbockers | Offense | 100.1 | 10 | 48.6 | 16.6 | ✔ | 26.4 | ✔ | 21.1 | ✔ | |
1978 | New York Knickerbockers | Offense | 101.7 | 9 | 48.8 | 16.7 | ✔ | 31.0 | ✔ | 21.4 | ✔ | |
1980 | Los Angeles Lakers | Offense | 109.5 | 1 | 53.0 | 16.5 | ✔ | 32.6 | ✔ | 22.0 | ✔ | |
1980 | Cleveland Cavaliers | Offense | 106.7 | 6 | 47.6 | ✔ | 13.2 | 33.1 | ✔ | 21.2 | ✔ | |
1984 | Phoenix Suns | Offense | 108.9 | 10 | 51.4 | 15.1 | ✔ | 31.4 | ✔ | 23.2 | ✔ | |
1987 | Denver Nuggets | Offense | 109.3 | 8 | 47.8 | ✔ | 11.8 | 32.2 | ✔ | 24.8 | ✔ | |
1988 | Denver Nuggets | Offense | 110.1 | 8 | 48.6 | ✔ | 11.7 | 29.7 | ✔ | 23.1 | ✔ | |
1992 | Milwaukee Bucks | Offense | 108.8 | 10 | 48.6 | ✔ | 14.2 | ✔ | 35.9 | 22.1 | ✔ | |
1993 | Houston Rockets | Offense | 109.6 | 6 | 51.5 | 14.5 | ✔ | 30.0 | ✔ | 23.5 | ✔ | |
1995 | Houston Rockets | Offense | 109.7 | 7 | 52.9 | 15.0 | ✔ | 26.9 | ✔ | 23.2 | ✔ | |
1997 | Houston Rockets | Offense | 108.8 | 7 | 52.0 | 15.6 | ✔ | 28.4 | ✔ | 23.2 | ✔ | |
1999 | Houston Rockets | Offense | 105.4 | 5 | 50.6 | 15.8 | ✔ | 27.8 | ✔ | 22.8 | ✔ | |
2008 | Phoenix Suns | Offense | 113.3 | 2 | 55.1 | 13.4 | ✔ | 22.4 | ✔ | 22.8 | ✔ |
I'll let Zach provide the commentary, so go check out his post at SI's Point Forward blog.
March 3rd, 2011 at 10:29 am
Heh, score 1 for the FTRate Sucks crowd =D
March 3rd, 2011 at 12:34 pm
Hah! Several of Hakeem's teams appear on the offensive list... interesting. It appears the eFG% numbers matter the most
March 3rd, 2011 at 12:38 pm
For the purpose of sorting, it would be better if we had two separate tables for O and D
March 3rd, 2011 at 12:45 pm
"It appears the eFG% numbers matter the most"
For Offense... Turnover % seems to matter the most for Defense