CBB: R.I.P. John Wooden (1910-2010)
Posted by Neil Paine on June 5, 2010
Note: This post was originally published at College Basketball Reference, S-R's brand-new College Hoops site, so when you're done reading, go over and check it out!
When the great John Wooden passed away on Friday at the age of 99, he left behind a staggering resume, arguably the most dominant winning legacy of any coach in any sport. Wooden won 10 championships at the helm of the UCLA Bruins during the 1960s and 70s, including an astonishing run of 7 straight titles from 1967-73; in the annals of basketball history, the only coach whose run of dominance is even on par with Wooden's is his NBA contemporary, Red Auerbach. Of course, Wooden was more than just a great coach -- and I'll leave the kind words about Wooden as a human being (of which there are many) to better writers than I -- but I did want to take a statistical look at just how amazing his coaching career was.
Exactly how impressive was Wooden's run in the 60s and early 70s? One measure of coaching greatness is the ability to resist the "pull of parity" -- since a .500 record relentlessly tugs at good teams and bad ones alike, drawing them inexorably toward the mean if given enough seasons, sustained greatness like Wooden's suggests a significant amount of skill. In the NCAA Tournament era (1939-present), we can quantify the pull of parity on any school thusly:
Expected Win % = 0.235 + 0.552*Previous Season Win %
This means that a team that won 88% of its games last year (for instance, Duke in 2010) should only expect to win 72% of its games next year, because parity wants to drag them toward .500. The assumption we're going to use is that if Duke ends up winning more than 72% of their games, it would be an indicator of Mike Krzyzewski's coaching skill.
So back to Coach Wooden... Here's his career coaching record, alongside his school's expected Win % every year, and the number of wins by which he exceeded that expectation:
Year | School | Conf | G | W | L | T | WPct | xWPct | WAE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1947 | INDS | IND | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 0.680 | 0.649 | 0.8 |
1948 | INDS | IND | 34 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0.794 | 0.610 | 6.2 |
1949 | UCLA | PC10 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 0.759 | 0.500 | 7.5 |
1950 | UCLA | PC10 | 31 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 0.774 | 0.654 | 3.7 |
1951 | UCLA | PC10 | 29 | 19 | 10 | 0 | 0.655 | 0.662 | -0.2 |
1952 | UCLA | PC10 | 31 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 0.613 | 0.597 | 0.5 |
1953 | UCLA | PC10 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0.667 | 0.573 | 2.2 |
1954 | UCLA | PC10 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 0.720 | 0.603 | 2.9 |
1955 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 0.808 | 0.633 | 4.6 |
1956 | UCLA | PC10 | 28 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0.786 | 0.681 | 2.9 |
1957 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0.846 | 0.669 | 4.6 |
1958 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 0.615 | 0.702 | -2.3 |
1959 | UCLA | PC10 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0.640 | 0.575 | 1.6 |
1960 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0.538 | 0.588 | -1.3 |
1961 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 0.692 | 0.532 | 4.2 |
1962 | UCLA | PC10 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0.621 | 0.617 | 0.1 |
1963 | UCLA | PC10 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 0.690 | 0.578 | 3.2 |
1964 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.616 | 11.5 |
1965 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0.933 | 0.787 | 4.4 |
1966 | UCLA | PC10 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 0.692 | 0.750 | -1.5 |
1967 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.617 | 11.5 |
1968 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0.967 | 0.787 | 5.4 |
1969 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0.967 | 0.769 | 5.9 |
1970 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0.933 | 0.769 | 4.9 |
1971 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0.967 | 0.750 | 6.5 |
1972 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.769 | 6.9 |
1973 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.787 | 6.4 |
1974 | UCLA | PC10 | 30 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 0.867 | 0.787 | 2.4 |
1975 | UCLA | PC10 | 31 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 0.903 | 0.713 | 5.9 |
For his career, Wooden eluded the pull of parity by 111.6 wins, which ranks him tied for 5th in the NCAA Tournament era:
Coach | TotalG | TotalWAE |
---|---|---|
Dean Smith | 1133 | 129.7 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1107 | 127.6 |
Lute Olson | 1060 | 117.0 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 875 | 113.8 |
Adolph Rupp | 863 | 111.6 |
John Wooden | 826 | 111.6 |
Bob Knight | 1273 | 108.1 |
Jim Boeheim | 1087 | 103.9 |
Jim Calhoun | 1121 | 103.2 |
Roy Williams | 732 | 103.0 |
Rick Pitino | 749 | 98.5 |
Eddie Sutton | 1132 | 97.5 |
Lefty Driesell | 1180 | 95.6 |
Lou Henson | 1140 | 88.2 |
Bob Huggins | 776 | 83.6 |
John Calipari | 580 | 80.6 |
John Thompson | 835 | 78.3 |
Ray Meyer | 1078 | 77.5 |
Don Haskins | 1072 | 72.0 |
Rick Majerus | 632 | 71.8 |
Frank McGuire | 785 | 71.7 |
Mike Montgomery | 824 | 71.4 |
Denny Crum | 970 | 71.2 |
Ralph Miller | 1039 | 69.9 |
Nolan Richardson | 716 | 65.7 |
Norm Stewart | 963 | 64.9 |
Billy Tubbs | 926 | 64.8 |
Lou Carnesecca | 726 | 64.6 |
Bill Self | 494 | 62.6 |
Jack Gardner | 721 | 62.3 |
He also did it in only 826 career games, which is fewer than any of the coaches around him on the list. If you set a minimum of 500 total games coached, only 2 coaches have kept their teams above the pull of parity on a per-game basis as much as Wooden did:
Coach | TotalG | TotalWAE | WAE/35G |
---|---|---|---|
Roy Williams | 732 | 103.0 | 4.9 |
John Calipari | 580 | 80.6 | 4.9 |
John Wooden | 826 | 111.6 | 4.7 |
Rick Pitino | 749 | 98.5 | 4.6 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 875 | 113.8 | 4.6 |
Adolph Rupp | 863 | 111.6 | 4.5 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1107 | 127.6 | 4.0 |
Dean Smith | 1133 | 129.7 | 4.0 |
Rick Majerus | 632 | 71.8 | 4.0 |
Lute Olson | 1060 | 117.0 | 3.9 |
Bob Huggins | 776 | 83.6 | 3.8 |
Everett Case | 511 | 51.7 | 3.5 |
Tubby Smith | 599 | 58.3 | 3.4 |
Jim Boeheim | 1087 | 103.9 | 3.3 |
John Thompson | 835 | 78.3 | 3.3 |
Jim Calhoun | 1121 | 103.2 | 3.2 |
Nolan Richardson | 716 | 65.7 | 3.2 |
Frank McGuire | 785 | 71.7 | 3.2 |
Lou Carnesecca | 726 | 64.6 | 3.1 |
Peck Hickman | 626 | 55.6 | 3.1 |
And if you set the cut-off to 800 total games coached, Wooden is the best of the Tourney era:
Coach | TotalG | TotalWAE | WAE/35G |
---|---|---|---|
John Wooden | 826 | 111.6 | 4.7 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 875 | 113.8 | 4.6 |
Adolph Rupp | 863 | 111.6 | 4.5 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1107 | 127.6 | 4.0 |
Dean Smith | 1133 | 129.7 | 4.0 |
Lute Olson | 1060 | 117.0 | 3.9 |
Jim Boeheim | 1087 | 103.9 | 3.3 |
John Thompson | 835 | 78.3 | 3.3 |
Jim Calhoun | 1121 | 103.2 | 3.2 |
Mike Montgomery | 824 | 71.4 | 3.0 |
Furthermore, his sustained run of excellence from 1967-73 was the greatest 7-year period of dominance in the Tourney era:
Coach | Start | Finish | 7yrWAE |
---|---|---|---|
John Wooden | 1967 | 1973 | 52.3 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1985 | 1991 | 48.1 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1996 | 2002 | 47.1 |
Adolph Rupp | 1946 | 1952 | 47.0 |
John Wooden | 1964 | 1970 | 46.9 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1986 | 1992 | 46.6 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1998 | 2004 | 46.2 |
Roy Williams | 2002 | 2008 | 46.0 |
Rick Pitino | 1991 | 1997 | 45.7 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1997 | 2003 | 45.7 |
John Wooden | 1963 | 1969 | 45.2 |
Ben Howland | 2002 | 2008 | 45.1 |
Adolph Rupp | 1945 | 1951 | 45.1 |
John Wooden | 1966 | 1972 | 44.4 |
John Wooden | 1969 | 1975 | 43.7 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1982 | 1988 | 43.6 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1983 | 1989 | 43.6 |
Roy Williams | 2003 | 2009 | 43.5 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1986 | 1992 | 43.4 |
John Wooden | 1968 | 1974 | 43.2 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1971 | 1977 | 43.1 |
John Calipari | 2002 | 2008 | 42.7 |
Jerry Tarkanian | 1984 | 1990 | 42.5 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1995 | 2001 | 42.4 |
Roy Williams | 1992 | 1998 | 42.2 |
Adolph Rupp | 1944 | 1950 | 42.2 |
Roy Williams | 2001 | 2007 | 42.2 |
Rick Pitino | 1990 | 1996 | 42.1 |
John Calipari | 1990 | 1996 | 42.0 |
John Wooden | 1965 | 1971 | 41.8 |
Adolph Rupp | 1943 | 1949 | 41.8 |
Billy Tubbs | 1982 | 1988 | 41.2 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1999 | 2005 | 41.1 |
Lute Olson | 1988 | 1994 | 41.1 |
Mike Krzyzewski | 1994 | 2000 | 40.9 |
Everett Case | 1947 | 1953 | 40.8 |
Dean Smith | 1981 | 1987 | 40.7 |
John Calipari | 2003 | 2009 | 40.7 |
Abe Lemons | 1972 | 1978 | 40.4 |
Roy Williams | 1996 | 2002 | 40.3 |
Truly, basketball lost one of the giants of the game this week, and he will be sorely missed. RIP Coach Wooden.
June 5th, 2010 at 7:05 pm
So much is often forgotten as to how great of a player he was. He was the first 3 time consensus All American and the Player of the Year in 1932. Wikipedia reports he was the 1933 National Basketball League Scoring Champion and I believe he was second in 1938 and 1939 in the new upstart NBL. He was nicknamed "The Indiana Rubber Man" for his hard-nosed defense and "suicidal dives on the hardcourt." He was regarded as a great ball handler and passer and his record for consecutive free throws made in competition still stands on all levels (134 or 138, despite "only" shooting 70% in college). His college teams went 15-2, 13-2 and 17-1 in his 3 years and he missed all losses in 1930 and 1932 (I don't know about 1931.)
Additionally, although I can't confirm if I read this correctly since, but a few years ago (maybe 2005) at the basketball hall of fame, I saw some statistics in a book for what I think was his college days at Purdue. His scoring numbers were consistent with what I knew them to be for those years (low double digits), but amazingly, he also averaged around 7 assists and shot slightly over 47% from the field. These numbers may not seem great, but considering his team scored 40 and allowed 25, this is astounding if it is true. (I haven't been able to find the book or any other mention of these statistics online. I also have seen only a handful of statistics involving FG% and Assists before the NBA, which makes it more questionable.) Only 1 person averaged over 2.5 assists per game in either 1946 or 1947 and only 2 shot over 35% from the field. In the least he dominated his era, like only a handful of players have. At most, he is in the discussion of being the most dominating and incredible players ever (subject to the credibility of some of these statistics).
June 6th, 2010 at 9:46 am
I'd be curious to see if there was less parity at some times in college basketball history than others. UCLA's achievements from 1967-73 feel unrepeatable today. I would think that has something to do with early entry - no team could keep Kareem or Bill Walton for more than a year now - but that's just speculation.
June 6th, 2010 at 8:08 pm
I'm sure it was easier with fewer games in the tournament, but it is interesting to note that, upon inspection, only UCLA and Kentucky made multiple championships from 1964 to 1975. (Kentucky lost to Texas Western in 1966 and UCLA in 1975. UCLA won 10 times in these years.) The past 12 years: Duke (3), Florida (3), Michigan St (2), UConn (2), UNC (2) and Kansas (2). I think a lot of it had to do with luck really. He probably won a few more than his team would have won with normal luck and was probably lucky to have 2 of the greatest college players of all time for 6 years and 5 championships. Of course he was definitely a great coach and extremely smart (I think he graduated 19th in his college class of 4500), but its hard to even define what a "good college coach" is. Recruiter? Strategist? Mentor?...So much other possible criteria. Wooden clearly is up there in many of these aspects. Another stat that might exaggerate how dominate he was, but is interesting nonetheless: He won 7 Iba COY awards no one else has more than 2.
June 7th, 2010 at 1:30 am
Scott's stat showing Wooden shooting 47% in the late Twenties/early Thirties is interesting. About every pro boxscore I've seen from those days has both teams shooting in the 20% to 30% range. Most of the time FG% was not kept in pro nor high school games, which had more money backing them than the colleges did.
As a player at Indiana's three levels -- schoolboy, college, pro -- Wooden Top Fives along with DeJernett, Big O, McGinnis & Bird. His greatest accomplishment was starring for the boys' State tournament champion in 1927, between losing the Finals of '26 & '28. Biggest regret may've been failing to coach South Bend Central to the title in '41, when the integrated Washington Hatchets won instead.
June 7th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
couple things popped to mind.
1) tournament size - in 1948-1949 (wooden's first year at ucla), the NCAA field was only 8 teams. When he retired after 1974-1975, the field had expanded to 32. Wooden's first title year, the field was 25, so his teams either had to beat 4 or 5 teams each year throughout the 10 titles. Not sure if Arkansas-Pine Bluff in the 1st round would have made a difference.
2) regions - back then, regionals were more aptly named. In their first title year, the West region consisted of UCLA, San Francisco, Seattle, Oregon State, Utah State and Arizona State. In 1973 (title #9), the West region was UCLA, Arizona State, Oklahoma State, Long Beach State, Weber State and San Francisco. Unlike today when you balance the bracket (for instance Syracuse this year being #1 in the west), UCLA did benefit from being on the West coast. This is not to take anything away from them, but most years they had weaker opponents to get through than the teams in the other 3 regions. They still dominated most years and would have probably done as well, but I imagine it would have been at least a little more difficult if teams were shipped like they are today.
3) tournament selection - prior to 1975, only 1 team per conference was allowed in the tournament. this rule of course got changed due to a # of incidents in the early 70s including the classic NC State-Maryland battles, NC State beating a perfect South Carolina (ACC team at the time) to take the berth, and USC being #3(?) nationally and their only 2 losses all season were to #1 UCLA. I know a number of conferences back then gave their berths to their regular season champions, but I don't know off-hand when the phenomonen of giving your berth to your tournament winner started.
Not sure if they have been done here or somewhere else on the net, but it would be interesting to see...
1) what the quality of teams in the West regions were back when UCLA was mowing the field and going to the final four in 12 of 13 years.
2) what the overall quality of the ncaa tournaments were prior to 1975 when only 1 team was allowed in per conference. I imagine that the overall quality is better due to allowing the 2nd-6th teams from the BCS conferences far outweigh the occasional fluke #7 or #8 seed that wins their conference. No idea how to measure this one off the top of my head.
3) how UCLA would have fared if the NCAA shipped teams cross country to even out the brackets like they do nowadays.
June 7th, 2010 at 4:58 pm
I've only seen one obit mention Sam Gilbert, the real difference maker for UCLA.
June 8th, 2010 at 12:47 am
IMO, it would hardly have been appropriate in an elegiac piece like this to mention the Gilbert rumors. What was Gilbert's role in UCLA's dynasty, and how much did Wooden know? I have no idea. Balzac once said that "behind every great fortune lies a great crime"; maybe in the NCAA, behind every great dynasty lies a great crime as well. Or maybe Wooden was just that good of a coach and recruiter. I can only work with the data, and the data says Wooden is one of the best ever... The rest is merely rumor, innuendo, and supposition.
June 8th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
I guess I have more of a Dan Jenkins take on things. The kids earn their keep, and have nothing to be ashamed of. There's no justification for paying the coach millions & the kids nothing, so it doesn't really happen.
My question is, is how the competitive situation changes through the years as different enforcement & payment regimes pass through. Did UCLA have a Yankees type advantage in the 1960s? Is the current higher level of parity financial?
With pro leagues, it's not too tough to follow the influence of money on competitive balance. With college sports, it's only when a coach gets on the bad side of the NCAA that anything comes out. A few months ago, there was some looking at coaches that "changed the culture of a program". It occurred to me later, that that probably meant they arranged funding to support continuing recruitment.
It would be fun if somebody asks John Wall how much he was paid at Kentucky.
June 9th, 2010 at 9:17 am
"I don't know off-hand when the phenomonen of giving your berth to your tournament winner started..."
Ironically, Johnny Wooden had something to do with it. When Wooden, DeJernett, & other early stars of Hoosier Hysteria were grabbing national headlines via their annual March Madness tournament (whose Regionals, Sweet Sixteens, and Final Fours the NCAA copied later on), they often competed against the powerful FrankFort Hot Dogs coached by one Everett Case. The CaseMen won four titles of their own during the Twenties and Thirties. After the War Everett Case was recruited to coach at North Carolina State. There he lobbied successfully for the ACC to adopt an Indiana-style tournament, on the basis of the excitement (& profits) such tourneys turn.
For years the ACC was the only conference that sent its "tourney winner" to the NCAAs. In 1974 the NCAA experimented with something called the CCC, whose first & only championship Bobby Knight's Hoosiers won & Knight called a "loser's tourney," respecting even the NIT-option more than the CCC. The tag of a "loser's tourney" eventually stuck to New York's NIT itself, & the Indianapolis-based NCAA bought out NY's NIT to put it out of its misery.
March 8th, 2011 at 8:31 am
"I don't know off-hand when the phenomonen of giving your berth to your tournament winner started..."
Actually, the old Southern Conference was the first to award their championship to an end of season tourney winner - Coach Case at NCSU and other ACC schools were in the SC in 40s and early 50s. The ACC was not formed until '53 and became the second - ACC excellence and excitement in 70s and 80s led to other conferences doing the same thing. I don't think Coach Wooden liked it at the time - but that may have been because UCLA always won the PAC 10 regular season title. But it does all go back to the Indiana tournament tradition, through Everett Case at NC State.