This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Most Dominant Playoff Tournament: Pool C, Round 2

Posted by Neil Paine on March 25, 2010

Now it's time for the second-round series from Pool C, courtesy of WhatIfSports (click on series links for game-by-game box scores):

#1 '96 Bulls vs. #8 '95 Rockets
Game 1: 96CHI 109, 95HOU 99
Game 2: 95HOU 119, 96CHI 96
Game 3: 96CHI 99, 95HOU 90
Game 4: 96CHI 116, 95HOU 101
Game 5: 96CHI 109, 95HOU 95
(1996 Bulls Win Series 4-1)

#4 '98 Bulls vs. #5 '99 Spurs
Game 1: 98CHI 117, 99SAS 112
Game 2: 98CHI 119, 99SAS 103
Game 3: 98CHI 114, 99SAS 105
Game 4: 99SAS 93, 98CHI 74
Game 5: 98CHI 107, 99SAS 89
(1998 Bulls Win Series 4-1)

#3 '73 Knicks vs. #11 '06 Heat
Game 1: 06MIA 127, 73NYK 103
Game 2: 06MIA 126, 73NYK 108
Game 3: 06MIA 145, 73NYK 112
Game 4: 06MIA 116, 73NYK 104
(2006 Heat Win Series 4-0)

#2 '61 Celtics vs. #7 '74 Celtics
Game 1: 61BOS 128, 74BOS 122
Game 2: 61BOS 119, 74BOS 110
Game 3: 61BOS 127, 74BOS 121
Game 4: 74BOS 113, 61BOS 112
Game 5: 74BOS 124, 61BOS 112
Game 6: 74BOS 141, 61BOS 119
Game 7: 74BOS 125, 61BOS 116
(1974 Celtics Win Series 4-3)

3 Responses to “Most Dominant Playoff Tournament: Pool C, Round 2”

  1. AYC Says:

    Yet again, Hakeem gets undervalued...
    Hakeem avgd 27.8 ppg in 95, 33.0 ppg in the playoffs, 32.8 ppg in the finals; in the 94 finals he avgd 26.9 ppg against a Knicks team that only allowed 85 ppg. The 96 Bulls would not hold him to 22.2 ppg with those 2 tomato cans they had at center. And since the Bulls needed 6 games to beat the sonics that year, I'm pretty sure Hakeem, Clyde, Horry, Cassell, Kenny, Mario and co. would have won more than one contest

    As I said before, this exercise seems to favor newer teams too much. I don't really understand why, since there are no stats for measuring the change in overall talent from year to year

  2. Ghost of Ehlo Says:

    Something tells me we're headed for a Bulls-Bulls-Bulls-Lakers/Celtics final four. Not surprising, really.

  3. Travis Says:

    The 2006 Heat are totally overvalued here bc of Shaq. In the 2006 Finals, he averaged a little over 13 pts a game, and it's not like the Mavs had any great defensive center. He was old. He was not going to be scoring 28/game like in his Lakers playoff games, yet thats what he's doing here.

    In fact, the 2006 Heat are overvalued period. They are not a very good team compared to other championship teams...a few things go different and the Mavs could have easily swept them in the Finals (they were down 2-0 and about to lose game 3 when suddenly Wade couldnt stop getting fouled). They only won 52 games. What are they doing in this bracket, let alone getting to the third game??