BBR Rankings: Schedule-Adjusted Offensive and Defensive Ratings (April 1, 2011)
Posted by Neil Paine on April 1, 2011
2010-11 NBA power rankings through the games played on March 31, 2011:
Rank | Prev | Team | Cnf | Div | W | L | WPct | Offense | Rk | Prv | Defense | Rk | Prv | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Chicago Bulls | E | C | 54 | 20 | 0.730 | 0.70 | 14 | 13 | -6.60 | 1 | 1 | 7.31 |
2 | 3 | Los Angeles Lakers | W | P | 54 | 20 | 0.730 | 4.37 | 3 | 2 | -2.92 | 6 | 8 | 7.29 |
3 | 2 | Miami Heat | E | SE | 52 | 23 | 0.693 | 4.28 | 4 | 5 | -2.79 | 7 | 5 | 7.08 |
4 | 4 | San Antonio Spurs | W | SW | 57 | 18 | 0.760 | 3.96 | 5 | 4 | -2.26 | 10 | 7 | 6.21 |
5 | 5 | Boston Celtics | E | A | 52 | 22 | 0.703 | -0.59 | 18 | 18 | -6.48 | 2 | 2 | 5.89 |
6 | 6 | Orlando Magic | E | SE | 47 | 28 | 0.627 | 0.78 | 13 | 12 | -4.53 | 3 | 3 | 5.32 |
7 | 7 | Denver Nuggets | W | NW | 45 | 29 | 0.608 | 4.95 | 1 | 1 | 0.14 | 16 | 17 | 4.82 |
8 | 8 | Dallas Mavericks | W | SW | 53 | 22 | 0.707 | 2.19 | 9 | 8 | -2.31 | 9 | 10 | 4.50 |
9 | 9 | Oklahoma City Thunder | W | NW | 50 | 24 | 0.676 | 3.58 | 7 | 6 | -0.27 | 14 | 14 | 3.85 |
10 | 10 | Memphis Grizzlies | W | SW | 42 | 33 | 0.560 | 0.42 | 15 | 16 | -2.31 | 8 | 9 | 2.73 |
11 | 11 | Houston Rockets | W | SW | 39 | 36 | 0.520 | 4.37 | 2 | 3 | 1.89 | 20 | 20 | 2.49 |
12 | 13 | Portland Trail Blazers | W | NW | 43 | 32 | 0.573 | 1.42 | 10 | 11 | -0.83 | 13 | 13 | 2.26 |
13 | 12 | New Orleans Hornets | W | SW | 43 | 32 | 0.573 | -0.82 | 20 | 21 | -3.05 | 5 | 6 | 2.23 |
14 | 14 | Philadelphia 76ers | E | A | 39 | 36 | 0.520 | -0.27 | 17 | 17 | -1.83 | 11 | 11 | 1.56 |
15 | 15 | New York Knickerbockers | E | A | 37 | 38 | 0.493 | 3.63 | 6 | 7 | 3.45 | 26 | 24 | 0.18 |
Rank | Prev | Team | Cnf | Div | W | L | WPct | Offense | Rk | Prv | Defense | Rk | Prv | Overall |
16 | 16 | Phoenix Suns | W | P | 36 | 38 | 0.486 | 2.26 | 8 | 9 | 2.65 | 23 | 22 | -0.39 |
17 | 17 | Atlanta Hawks | E | SE | 43 | 32 | 0.573 | -0.73 | 19 | 19 | -0.26 | 15 | 15 | -0.47 |
18 | 20 | Milwaukee Bucks | E | C | 30 | 44 | 0.405 | -5.68 | 30 | 30 | -4.27 | 4 | 4 | -1.42 |
19 | 18 | Indiana Pacers | E | C | 34 | 42 | 0.447 | -2.74 | 23 | 23 | -1.17 | 12 | 12 | -1.57 |
20 | 19 | Utah Jazz | W | NW | 36 | 39 | 0.480 | 1.14 | 11 | 10 | 2.88 | 24 | 25 | -1.73 |
21 | 22 | Golden State Warriors | W | P | 32 | 44 | 0.421 | 0.82 | 12 | 14 | 3.64 | 27 | 27 | -2.82 |
22 | 21 | Los Angeles Clippers | W | P | 29 | 46 | 0.387 | -1.50 | 22 | 22 | 1.63 | 19 | 19 | -3.13 |
23 | 23 | Charlotte Bobcats | E | SE | 32 | 42 | 0.432 | -3.92 | 25 | 26 | 0.32 | 17 | 16 | -4.25 |
24 | 24 | Detroit Pistons | E | C | 26 | 48 | 0.351 | 0.12 | 16 | 15 | 4.69 | 29 | 28 | -4.57 |
25 | 26 | Sacramento Kings | W | P | 21 | 53 | 0.284 | -3.97 | 26 | 25 | 1.19 | 18 | 18 | -5.16 |
26 | 25 | Minnesota Timberwolves | W | NW | 17 | 58 | 0.227 | -3.04 | 24 | 24 | 2.56 | 22 | 23 | -5.60 |
27 | 27 | New Jersey Nets | E | A | 23 | 51 | 0.311 | -4.31 | 27 | 27 | 2.07 | 21 | 21 | -6.37 |
28 | 28 | Toronto Raptors | E | A | 20 | 54 | 0.270 | -1.18 | 21 | 20 | 5.72 | 30 | 30 | -6.91 |
29 | 29 | Washington Wizards | E | SE | 18 | 56 | 0.243 | -4.99 | 28 | 28 | 3.35 | 25 | 26 | -8.34 |
30 | 30 | Cleveland Cavaliers | E | C | 15 | 59 | 0.203 | -5.61 | 29 | 29 | 4.55 | 28 | 29 | -10.16 |
HCA | 3.37 | |||||||||||||
LgRtg | 108.01 |
To read more about the methodology and what these numbers mean, click here.
April 1st, 2011 at 10:48 am
I didn't realize how close things have gotten at the top of the West. What are the odds that LA catches SA?
April 2nd, 2011 at 3:04 pm
any chance you will have the pomeroy style rankings posted in the comments again?
April 7th, 2011 at 6:44 am
A little question: What is the difference between the DefRtg here and things like DefEff on Hollingers ESPN? Both are counting points allowed per 100 possessions, but there is a slight difference. Boston for example has a DefRtg of 100.1 but a DefEff of 97.6.
April 7th, 2011 at 9:35 am
I think they use a different formula for possessions. We use:
Poss = 0.5 * ((Tm FGA + 0.4 * Tm FTA - 1.07 * (Tm ORB / (Tm ORB + Opp DRB)) * (Tm FGA - Tm FG) + Tm TOV) + (Opp FGA + 0.4 * Opp FTA - 1.07 * (Opp ORB / (Opp ORB + Tm DRB)) * (Opp FGA - Opp FG) + Opp TOV))
And in the past, Hollinger always used:
Poss = FGA − ORb + TO + .44 * FTA
April 7th, 2011 at 11:22 am
Ah, OK, Thanks!